You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From theory to 'measurement' in complex interventions: Methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-12-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy L Finch, Frances S Mair, Catherine O’Donnell, Elizabeth Murray, Carl R May |
| Abstract |
Although empirical and theoretical understanding of processes of implementation in health care is advancing, translation of theory into structured measures that capture the complex interplay between interventions, individuals and context remain limited. This paper aimed to (1) describe the process and outcome of a project to develop a theory-based instrument for measuring implementation processes relating to e-health interventions; and (2) identify key issues and methodological challenges for advancing work in this field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 60% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Zambia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 218 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 19% |
| Researcher | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 11% |
| Psychology | 22 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,356,049
of 25,142,442 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#831
of 2,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,501
of 169,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,142,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.