You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Progress and development on biological information of crop phenotype research applied to real-time variable-rate fertilization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-0559-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yinyan Shi, Yang Zhu, Xiaochan Wang, Xin Sun, Yangfen Ding, Wexing Cao, Zhichao Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 26% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#18,048,896
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#914
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,461
of 449,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#35
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.