You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sequential screening for depression in humanitarian emergencies: a validation study of the Patient Health Questionnaire among Syrian refugees
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of General Psychiatry, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12991-020-0259-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle N. Poole, Shirley Liao, Elysia Larson, Bethany Hedt-Gauthier, Nathaniel A. Raymond, Till Bärnighausen, Mary C. Smith Fawzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 35% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
| Psychology | 5 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,777,349
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#82
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,990
of 452,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.