↓ Skip to main content

Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Context, complexity and process in the implementation of evidence-based innovation: a realist informed review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12913-020-4935-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. D. Dryden-Palmer, C. S. Parshuram, W. B. Berta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 50 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 9%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 56 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,376,592
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#978
of 8,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,250
of 456,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#36
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.