↓ Skip to main content

Applying trauma systems concepts to humanitarian battlefield care: a qualitative analysis of the Mosul trauma pathway

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying trauma systems concepts to humanitarian battlefield care: a qualitative analysis of the Mosul trauma pathway
Published in
Conflict and Health, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13031-019-0249-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kent Garber, Adam L. Kushner, Sherry M. Wren, Paul H. Wise, Paul B. Spiegel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Unspecified 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 15 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Unspecified 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,414,325
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#96
of 595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,897
of 452,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 595 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.