You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Health equity in the New Zealand health care system: a national survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-10-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolette F Sheridan, Timothy W Kenealy, Martin J Connolly, Faith Mahony, P Alan Barber, Mary Anne Boyd, Peter Carswell, Janet Clinton, Gerard Devlin, Robert Doughty, Lorna Dyall, Ngaire Kerse, John Kolbe, Ross Lawrenson, Allan Moffitt |
| Abstract |
In all countries people experience different social circumstances that result in avoidable differences in health. In New Zealand, Māori, Pacific peoples, and those with lower socioeconomic status experience higher levels of chronic illness, which is the leading cause of mortality, morbidity and inequitable health outcomes. Whilst the health system can enable a fairer distribution of good health, limited national data is available to measure health equity. Therefore, we sought to find out whether health services in New Zealand were equitable by measuring the level of development of components of chronic care management systems across district health boards. Variation in provision by geography, condition or ethnicity can be interpreted as inequitable. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 4 | 57% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 305 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 9% |
| Researcher | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 47 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 89 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,281,025
of 25,410,626 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#604
of 2,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,336
of 151,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,410,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.