↓ Skip to main content

Are the stages of change relevant for the development and implementation of a web-based tailored alcohol intervention? A cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are the stages of change relevant for the development and implementation of a web-based tailored alcohol intervention? A cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniela N Schulz, Stef PJ Kremers, Hein de Vries

Abstract

Computer-tailored programs are a promising tool to stimulate health behavior change, such as reducing alcohol intake. Yet more research is needed to assess whether groups differing in their motivational level to change may need different types of feedback. Furthermore, it is unknown whether motivational level may also determine reactions to computer-tailored interventions. Our aim is to identify the potential relevance of the application of the stages of change concept in the development and implementation of alcohol interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 120 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Social Sciences 18 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,413,731
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#7,818
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,445
of 164,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#105
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.