You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of methodology used in the development of prediction models for future asthma exacerbation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-0913-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua Bridge, John D. Blakey, Laura J. Bonnett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#12,853,879
of 23,191,112 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,168
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,521
of 449,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#31
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,191,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.