You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving the care for people with acute low-back pain by allied health professionals (the ALIGN trial): A cluster randomised trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne E McKenzie, Denise A O'Connor, Matthew J Page, Duncan S Mortimer, Simon D French, Bruce F Walker, Jennifer L Keating, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Susan Michie, Jill J Francis, Sally E Green |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 32 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
| Psychology | 17 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 39 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,326,948
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,695
of 1,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,709
of 101,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.