You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using psychological theory to understand the clinical management of type 2 diabetes in Primary Care: a comparison across two European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-9-140 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan Hrisos, Martin P Eccles, Jill J Francis, Marije Bosch, Rob Dijkstra, Marie Johnston, Richard Grol, Eileen FS Kaner, Ian N Steen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 16% |
| Psychology | 18 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2012.
All research outputs
#20,326,948
of 22,870,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#7,115
of 7,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,709
of 111,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#26
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,870,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.