You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mental health care for irregular migrants in Europe: Barriers and how they are overcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-367 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christa Straßmayr, Aleksandra Matanov, Stefan Priebe, Henrique Barros, Reamonn Canavan, José Manuel Díaz-Olalla, Edina Gabor, Andrea Gaddini, Tim Greacen, Petra Holcnerová, Ulrike Kluge, Marta Welbel, Pablo Nicaise, Aart H Schene, Joaquim JF Soares, Heinz Katschnig |
| Abstract |
Irregular migrants (IMs) are exposed to a wide range of risk factors for developing mental health problems. However, little is known about whether and how they receive mental health care across European countries. The aims of this study were (1) to identify barriers to mental health care for IMs, and (2) to explore ways by which these barriers are overcome in practice. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 20 | 19% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#6,005,164
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,160
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,779
of 163,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#68
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.