You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Purifying selection of long dsRNA is the first line of defense against false activation of innate immunity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-020-1937-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michal Barak, Hagit T. Porath, Gilad Finkelstein, Binyamin A. Knisbacher, Ilana Buchumenski, Shalom Hillel Roth, Erez Y. Levanon, Eli Eisenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#4,648,998
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,746
of 4,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,682
of 469,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#68
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,470 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.