You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of adverse events between video and direct laryngoscopes for tracheal intubations in emergency department and ICU patients–a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13049-020-0702-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jia Jiang, Na Kang, Bo Li, An-Shi Wu, Fu-Shan Xue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
Canada | 2 | 18% |
United States | 1 | 9% |
Germany | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 17 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,790,829
of 23,864,690 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#453
of 1,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,551
of 454,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#9
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,864,690 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.