↓ Skip to main content

Segmentation of roots in soil with U-Net

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Segmentation of roots in soil with U-Net
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13007-020-0563-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abraham George Smith, Jens Petersen, Raghavendra Selvan, Camilla Ruø Rasmussen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 119 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Master 12 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 44 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 16%
Engineering 18 15%
Computer Science 17 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 50 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,702,100
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#272
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,144
of 454,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#15
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.