↓ Skip to main content

Microvascular reactivity is altered early in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microvascular reactivity is altered early in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Respiratory Research, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12931-016-0375-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diego Orbegozo Cortés, Lokmane Rahmania, Marian Irazabal, Carlos Santacruz, Vito Fontana, Daniel De Backer, Jacques Creteur, Jean-Louis Vincent

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with vascular endothelial dysfunction. The resultant microvascular reactivity can be assessed non-invasively using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and a vascular occlusion test (VOT) and changes have been correlated with severity of organ dysfunction and mortality in other critically ill populations. We used NIRS to study the presence of microcirculatory alterations in patients with ARDS. We studied 27 healthy volunteers and 32 ARDS patients admitted to our intensive care department. NIRS measurements were performed within 24 h after diagnosis (Berlin definition). VOTs were performed by inflating an arm-cuff to a pressure greater than the systolic pressure for 3 min, followed by rapid deflation. The descending (Desc) and ascending (Asc) thenar muscle oxygen saturation (StO2) slopes were calculated. We compared data from volunteers with those from ARDS patients, from ARDS survivors and non-survivors, and from ARDS survivors who required <7 days ventilatory support (good evolution) with those who required >7 days support or died (poor evolution). ARDS patients had lower StO2 values [75(67-80) vs 79(76-81) %, p = 0.04] and Asc slopes [185(115-233) vs 258(216-306) %/min, p < 0.01] than healthy volunteers, but Desc slopes were similar. The Asc slope was lower in the patients with a poor evolution than in the other patients [121(90-209) vs 222(170-293) %/min, p < 0.01], and in the non-survivors than in the survivors [95(73-120) vs 212(165-252) %/min, p < 0.01]. In ARDS patients, microvascular reactivity is altered early, and the changes are directly related to the severity of the disease. The ascending slope is the best determinant of outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 18 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Physics and Astronomy 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 20 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#2,216
of 3,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,114
of 342,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.