↓ Skip to main content

Plasma profile of microRNA after supplementation with high doses of vitamin D3 for 12 months

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plasma profile of microRNA after supplementation with high doses of vitamin D3 for 12 months
Published in
BMC Research Notes, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-5-245
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolf Jorde, Johan Svartberg, Ragnar Martin Joakimsen, Dag H Coucheron

Abstract

Recently a large number of short non-coding-RNAs (microRNAs, (miRNA)) have been identified. These miRNAs act as post-transcriptional regulators where they generally have an inhibitory function. miRNAs are present in all human cells, and they are also detected in serum or plasma. The miRNAs have a broad range of actions, and their biogenesis must therefore be under tight control. One putative regulator of miRNA biogenesis or miRNA level could be vitamin D, an ancient hormone with effects on cell growth and differentiation, apoptosis and the immune system. In our study miRNA were reversed transcribed in total RNA isolated from plasma and analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using the miRCURY LNA Universal RT microRNA PCR system (Exiqon). In 10 pilot subjects 136 miRNAs were detected in one or more plasma samples drawn at baseline and after 12 months of vitamin D supplementation. The twelve miRNAs that showed the greatest change in expression in these pilots were further analyzed by RT-qPCR of RNA from baseline and 12 months plasma samples in 40 subjects given high dose vitamin D(3) (20.000-40.000 IU per week) and 37 subjects given placebo.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Unknown 51 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2012.
All research outputs
#18,306,425
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,005
of 4,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,642
of 164,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#46
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,248 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.