↓ Skip to main content

Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
513 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
550 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2415-10-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Usha Chakravarthy, Tien Y Wong, Astrid Fletcher, Elisabeth Piault, Christopher Evans, Gergana Zlateva, Ronald Buggage, Andreas Pleil, Paul Mitchell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 550 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 539 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 90 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 15%
Researcher 65 12%
Student > Master 62 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 8%
Other 107 19%
Unknown 104 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 219 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 3%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 127 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2013.
All research outputs
#5,610,213
of 17,367,552 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#240
of 1,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,639
of 270,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,367,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,524 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them