You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12874-020-0912-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toni Lange, Christian Kopkow, Jörg Lützner, Klaus-Peter Günther, Sascha Gravius, Hanns-Peter Scharf, Johannes Stöve, Richard Wagner, Jochen Schmitt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 19% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Ireland | 2 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
| Psychology | 7 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 33 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,467,700
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#360
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,717
of 475,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#17
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.