You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A systematic evaluation of digital nutrition promotion websites and apps for supporting parents to influence children’s nutrition
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12966-020-0915-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dorota Zarnowiecki, Chelsea E. Mauch, Georgia Middleton, Louisa Matwiejczyk, Wendy L. Watson, Jane Dibbs, Anita Dessaix, Rebecca K. Golley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 46% |
Ireland | 2 | 15% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 31% |
Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 302 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
Researcher | 23 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 5% |
Other | 54 | 18% |
Unknown | 135 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 50 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 21 | 7% |
Psychology | 12 | 4% |
Unspecified | 9 | 3% |
Other | 41 | 14% |
Unknown | 139 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,587,820
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,281
of 1,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,078
of 455,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#34
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.