You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessment of eight HPV vaccination programs implemented in lowest income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-370 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joël Ladner, Marie-Hélène Besson, Rachel Hampshire, Lisa Tapert, Mike Chirenje, Joseph Saba |
| Abstract |
Cervix cancer, preventable, continues to be the third most common cancer in women worldwide, especially in lowest income countries. Prophylactic HPV vaccination should help to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with cervical cancer. The purpose of the study was to describe the results of and key concerns in eight HPV vaccination programs conducted in seven lowest income countries through the Gardasil Access Program (GAP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 22% |
| Researcher | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#4,298,570
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,797
of 15,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,560
of 166,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#45
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.