↓ Skip to main content

Anti-inflammatory effect of bee pollen ethanol extract from Cistus sp. of Spanish on carrageenan-induced rat hind paw edema

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-inflammatory effect of bee pollen ethanol extract from Cistus sp. of Spanish on carrageenan-induced rat hind paw edema
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-10-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroe Maruyama, Takashi Sakamoto, Yoko Araki, Hideaki Hara

Abstract

Bee pollen, a honeybee product, is the feed for honeybees prepared themselves by pollens collecting from plants and has been consumed as a perfect food in Europe, because it is nutritionally well balanced. In this study, we aimed to investigate the anti-inflammatory effect of bee pollen from Cistus sp. of Spanish origin by a method of carrageenan-induced paw edema in rats, and to investigate the mechanism of anti-inflammatory action and also to elucidate components involved in bee pollen extracted with ethanol.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 13%
Chemistry 15 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#510,151
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#65
of 3,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,336
of 93,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,617 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.