↓ Skip to main content

Significantly different clinical phenotypes associated with mutations in synthesis and transamidase+remodeling glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis genes

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Significantly different clinical phenotypes associated with mutations in synthesis and transamidase+remodeling glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis genes
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13023-020-1313-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leigh C. Carmody, Hannah Blau, Daniel Danis, Xingman A. Zhang, Jean-Philippe Gourdine, Nicole Vasilevsky, Peter Krawitz, Miles D. Thompson, Peter N. Robinson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Psychology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#12,853,879
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,234
of 2,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,565
of 449,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#25
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.