You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A qualitative study of physician perspectives on adaptation to electronic health records
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-020-1030-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Cynthia J. Sieck, Nicole Pearl, Tiffani J. Bright, Po-Yin Yen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 16% |
Unknown | 46 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 15 | 14% |
Unknown | 56 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,263,476
of 23,192,960 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#378
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,033
of 455,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,192,960 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.