You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
To use or not to use a condom: A prospective cohort study comparing contraceptive practices among HIV-infected and HIV-negative youth in Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-11-144 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Frank Kaharuza, Anna Mia Ekström, Stella Neema, Asli Kulane, Florence Mirembe |
Abstract |
Unwanted pregnancy and HIV infection are issues of significant concern to young people. Limited data exists on contraceptive decision-making and practices among HIV-infected and HIV-negative young people in low resource settings with generalized HIV epidemics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 20% |
Researcher | 21 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Other | 25 | 14% |
Unknown | 43 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 35 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Other | 16 | 9% |
Unknown | 47 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,919,256
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#921
of 7,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,320
of 111,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.