↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of malignant hyperthermia diagnosis in obstetric patients in the United States, 2003 to 2014

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Anesthesiology, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of malignant hyperthermia diagnosis in obstetric patients in the United States, 2003 to 2014
Published in
BMC Anesthesiology, January 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12871-020-0934-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Guglielminotti, Henry Rosenberg, Guohua Li

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 13 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Unspecified 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 1 4%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 13 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#22,757,238
of 25,378,799 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#1,338
of 1,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#399,272
of 472,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,698 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.