You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How effective are strategies to control the dissemination of antibiotic resistance in the environment? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-0187-x |
| Authors |
Anaïs Goulas, Drifa Belhadi, Alexandre Descamps, Antoine Andremont, Pierre Benoit, Sophie Courtois, Christophe Dagot, Nathalie Grall, David Makowski, Sylvie Nazaret, Sylvie Nélieu, Dominique Patureau, Fabienne Petit, Céline Roose-Amsaleg, Marion Vittecoq, Barbara Livoreil, Cédric Laouénan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 18% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| Germany | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| South Africa | 2 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 52% |
| Scientists | 17 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 146 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 26 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 60 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,198,199
of 24,859,977 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#40
of 322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,872
of 365,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,859,977 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 322 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.