You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supporting the use of research evidence in decision-making in crisis zones in low- and middle-income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-0530-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ahmad Firas Khalid, John N. Lavis, Fadi El-Jardali, Meredith Vanstone |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 21% |
| United States | 7 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#714,129
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#41
of 1,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,072
of 382,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#2
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,393 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.