↓ Skip to main content

Differences in virulence between the two more prevalent Staphylococcus aureus clonal complexes in rabbitries (CC121 and CC96) using an experimental model of mammary gland infection

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in virulence between the two more prevalent Staphylococcus aureus clonal complexes in rabbitries (CC121 and CC96) using an experimental model of mammary gland infection
Published in
Veterinary Research, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13567-020-0740-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariola Penadés, David Viana, Ana García-Quirós, Asunción Muñoz-Silvestre, Elena Moreno-Grua, Sara Pérez-Fuentes, Juan José Pascual, Juan M. Corpa, Laura Selva

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#1,199
of 1,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#406,652
of 476,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#22
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.