You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can childcare work be designed to promote moderate and vigorous physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness and health? Study protocol for the Goldilocks-childcare randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-8291-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Lidegaard, Anders Fritz Lerche, Pernille Kold Munch, Kathrine Greby Schmidt, Charlotte Lund Rasmussen, Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Svend Erik Mathiassen, Leon Straker, Andreas Holtermann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 58 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 16 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,287,432
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,675
of 17,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,405
of 382,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#123
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.