↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating malaria programmes in moderate- and low-transmission settings: practical ways to generate robust evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating malaria programmes in moderate- and low-transmission settings: practical ways to generate robust evidence
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03158-z
Authors

Ruth A. Ashton, Debra Prosnitz, Andrew Andrada, Samantha Herrera, Yazoumé Yé

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 6 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,236,051
of 17,377,895 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,125
of 4,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,602
of 265,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,377,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them