You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-020-0713-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F. M. Aarestrup, A. Albeyatti, W. J. Armitage, C. Auffray, L. Augello, R. Balling, N. Benhabiles, G. Bertolini, J. G. Bjaalie, M. Black, N. Blomberg, P. Bogaert, M. Bubak, B. Claerhout, L. Clarke, B. De Meulder, G. D’Errico, A. Di Meglio, N. Forgo, C. Gans-Combe, A. E. Gray, I. Gut, A. Gyllenberg, G. Hemmrich-Stanisak, L. Hjorth, Y. Ioannidis, S. Jarmalaite, A. Kel, F. Kherif, J. O. Korbel, C. Larue, M. Laszlo, A. Maas, L. Magalhaes, I. Manneh-Vangramberen, E. Morley-Fletcher, C. Ohmann, P. Oksvold, N. P. Oxtoby, I. Perseil, V. Pezoulas, O. Riess, H. Riper, J. Roca, P. Rosenstiel, P. Sabatier, F. Sanz, M. Tayeb, G. Thomassen, J. Van Bussel, M. Van den Bulcke, H. Van Oyen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 4 | 6% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 79% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 76 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 22 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
| Engineering | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 25% |
| Unknown | 81 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#891,030
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#171
of 1,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,964
of 384,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.