↓ Skip to main content

The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of taping versus semi-rigid bracing on patient outcome and satisfaction in ankle sprains: a prospective, randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sacha Lardenoye, Ed Theunissen, Berry Cleffken, Peter RG Brink, Rob A de Bie, Martijn Poeze

Abstract

Functional treatment is a widely used and generally accepted treatment for ankle sprain. A meta-analysis comparing the different functional treatment options could not make definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness, and until now, little was known about patient satisfaction in relation to the outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 252 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 72 28%
Student > Master 47 18%
Student > Postgraduate 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 19%
Sports and Recreations 30 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,233,544
of 25,351,219 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,337
of 4,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,616
of 171,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,351,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.