↓ Skip to main content

Member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex can be misidentified as Anopheles leesoni

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex can be misidentified as Anopheles leesoni
Published in
Malaria Journal, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12936-020-03168-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yael Dahan-Moss, Allison Hendershot, Minishca Dhoogra, Henry Julius, Jacek Zawada, Maria Kaiser, Neil F. Lobo, Basil D. Brooke, Lizette L. Koekemoer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 27 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 31 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,290,611
of 23,195,584 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,278
of 5,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,981
of 361,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#48
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,195,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.