↓ Skip to main content

Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,386)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
153 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
604 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
552 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher M. Kramer, Jörg Barkhausen, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, Scott D. Flamm, Raymond J. Kim, Eike Nagel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 552 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 552 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 70 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 12%
Other 53 10%
Student > Master 39 7%
Student > Bachelor 35 6%
Other 96 17%
Unknown 193 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 215 39%
Engineering 44 8%
Computer Science 12 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Unspecified 9 2%
Other 48 9%
Unknown 213 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#401,640
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#9
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,679
of 385,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.