You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science Communications, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s43058-020-00015-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lauren T. Southerland, Julie A. Stephens, Christopher R. Carpenter, Lorraine C. Mion, Susan D. Moffatt-Bruce, Angela Zachman, Michael Hill, Jeffrey M. Caterino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 30% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 44% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Professor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 31 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,365,112
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science Communications
#73
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,728
of 366,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science Communications
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.