| Title |
Critical care response to a hospital outbreak of the 2019-nCoV infection in Shenzhen, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2786-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Liu, Jinxiu Li, Yongwen Feng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 549 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 549 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 8% |
| Other | 45 | 8% |
| Other | 131 | 24% |
| Unknown | 131 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 51 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 139 | 25% |
| Unknown | 160 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,304,502
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,029
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,418
of 383,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.