You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suggested guidelines for the diagnosis and management of urea cycle disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-7-32 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johannes Häberle, Nathalie Boddaert, Alberto Burlina, Anupam Chakrapani, Marjorie Dixon, Martina Huemer, Daniela Karall, Diego Martinelli, Pablo Sanjurjo Crespo, René Santer, Aude Servais, Vassili Valayannopoulos, Martin Lindner, Vicente Rubio, Carlo Dionisi-Vici |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 460 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 13% |
| Researcher | 61 | 13% |
| Other | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 11% |
| Other | 69 | 15% |
| Unknown | 112 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 154 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 128 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,119,793
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#242
of 3,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,649
of 179,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.