You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-51 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Douglas G Altman, Lisa M McShane, Willi Sauerbrei, Sheila E Taube |
Abstract |
The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. It was developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. In this paper we expand on the REMARK checklist to enhance its use and effectiveness through better understanding of the intent of each item and why the information is important to report. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
Philippines | 1 | 11% |
Mexico | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
Scientists | 4 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Lithuania | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 1% |
Unknown | 152 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 30 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 18% |
Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 36 | 22% |
Unknown | 27 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,481,720
of 24,172,513 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,613
of 3,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,755
of 168,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#20
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,172,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.