↓ Skip to main content

The effect of yoga on women with secondary arm lymphoedema from breast cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
287 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of yoga on women with secondary arm lymphoedema from breast cancer treatment
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-12-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annette Loudon, Tony Barnett, Neil Piller, Maarten A Immink, Denis Visentin, Andrew D Williams

Abstract

Women who develop secondary arm lymphoedema subsequent to treatment associated with breast cancer require life-long management for a range of symptoms including arm swelling, heaviness, tightness in the arm and sometimes the chest, upper body impairment and changes to a range of parameters relating to quality of life. While exercise under controlled conditions has had positive outcomes, the impact of yoga has not been investigated. The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of yoga in the physical and psycho-social domains, in the hope that women can be offered another safe, holistic modality to help control many, if not all, of the effects of secondary arm lymphoedema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 287 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 281 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Student > Bachelor 30 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 57 20%
Unknown 76 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 14%
Psychology 26 9%
Sports and Recreations 19 7%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 87 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,836,804
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#899
of 3,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,204
of 166,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#28
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.