↓ Skip to main content

Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,249)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
940 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-019-0983-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars Jørgensen, Peter C. Gøtzsche, Tom Jefferson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 940 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 47 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 49 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 683. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#31,361
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 2,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,061
of 384,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.