↓ Skip to main content

The use of taxon-specific reference databases compromises metagenomic classification

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of taxon-specific reference databases compromises metagenomic classification
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12864-020-6592-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa R. Marcelino, Edward C. Holmes, Tania C. Sorrell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 25%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,033,607
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#453
of 11,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,835
of 384,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#8
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.