↓ Skip to main content

Reducing ligation bias of small RNAs in libraries for next generation sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Silence, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing ligation bias of small RNAs in libraries for next generation sequencing
Published in
Silence, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1758-907x-3-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karim Sorefan, Helio Pais, Adam E Hall, Ana Kozomara, Sam Griffiths-Jones, Vincent Moulton, Tamas Dalmay

Abstract

The use of nucleic acid-modifying enzymes has driven the rapid advancement in molecular biology. Understanding their function is important for modifying or improving their activity. However, functional analysis usually relies upon low-throughput experiments. Here we present a method for functional analysis of nucleic acid-modifying enzymes using next generation sequencing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
South Africa 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 183 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 25%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Other 24 12%
Unknown 19 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 29%
Computer Science 7 4%
Engineering 5 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 23 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,587,470
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Silence
#4
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,135
of 165,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Silence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them