You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Complementary feeding practices and nutrient intakes of children aged 6–24 months from Bangladeshi background living in Tower Hamlets, East London: a feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41043-020-0213-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura Jabri, Diana Margot Rosenthal, Lorna Benton, Monica Lakhanpaul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 61 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,242,777
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#97
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,848
of 382,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them