You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aging impairs contraction-induced human skeletal muscle mTORC1 signaling and protein synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Skeletal Muscle, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2044-5040-1-11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher S Fry, Micah J Drummond, Erin L Glynn, Jared M Dickinson, David M Gundermann, Kyle L Timmerman, Dillon K Walker, Shaheen Dhanani, Elena Volpi, Blake B Rasmussen |
| Abstract |
Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass during aging, increases the risk for falls and dependency. Resistance exercise (RE) training is an effective treatment to improve muscle mass and strength in older adults, but aging is associated with a smaller amount of training-induced hypertrophy. This may be due in part to an inability to stimulate muscle-protein synthesis (MPS) after an acute bout of RE. We hypothesized that older adults would have impaired mammalian target of rapamycin complex (mTORC)1 signaling and MPS response compared with young adults after acute RE. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 62% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 281 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 17% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Professor | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 50 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 40 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,888,497
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#38
of 372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,824
of 110,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them