You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Infected aneurysm of the thoracic aorta probably caused by Bacillus cereus: a case report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4602-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tzu-Chi Wu, Ching-Chou Pai, Pin-Wen Huang, Chun-Bin Tung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,608,793
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,609
of 7,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,951
of 360,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#42
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.