↓ Skip to main content

Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID)
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/ar3859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxime Dougados, Yves Brault, Isabelle Logeart, Désirée van der Heijde, Laure Gossec, Tore Kvien

Abstract

The Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) is a patient-reported outcome measure evaluating the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on patient quality of life. It comprises 7 domains that are evaluated as continuous variables from 0 (best) to 10 (worst). The objective was to define and identify cut-off values for disease activity states as well as improvement scores in order to present results at the individual level (for example, patient in acceptable state, improved patient).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,710,488
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#866
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,176
of 178,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,896 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.