↓ Skip to main content

A unified phylogeny-based nomenclature for histone variants

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 571)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
381 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A unified phylogeny-based nomenclature for histone variants
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-8935-5-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul B Talbert, Kami Ahmad, Geneviève Almouzni, Juan Ausió, Frederic Berger, Prem L Bhalla, William M Bonner, W Zacheus Cande, Brian P Chadwick, Simon W L Chan, George A M Cross, Liwang Cui, Stefan I Dimitrov, Detlef Doenecke, José M Eirin-López, Martin A Gorovsky, Sandra B Hake, Barbara A Hamkalo, Sarah Holec, Steven E Jacobsen, Kinga Kamieniarz, Saadi Khochbin, Andreas G Ladurner, David Landsman, John A Latham, Benjamin Loppin, Harmit S Malik, William F Marzluff, John R Pehrson, Jan Postberg, Robert Schneider, Mohan B Singh, M Mitchell Smith, Eric Thompson, Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla, David John Tremethick, Bryan M Turner, Jakob Harm Waterborg, Heike Wollmann, Ramesh Yelagandula, Bing Zhu, Steven Henikoff

Abstract

Histone variants are non-allelic protein isoforms that play key roles in diversifying chromatin structure. The known number of such variants has greatly increased in recent years, but the lack of naming conventions for them has led to a variety of naming styles, multiple synonyms and misleading homographs that obscure variant relationships and complicate database searches. We propose here a unified nomenclature for variants of all five classes of histones that uses consistent but flexible naming conventions to produce names that are informative and readily searchable. The nomenclature builds on historical usage and incorporates phylogenetic relationships, which are strong predictors of structure and function. A key feature is the consistent use of punctuation to represent phylogenetic divergence, making explicit the relationships among variant subtypes that have previously been implicit or unclear. We recommend that by default new histone variants be named with organism-specific paralog-number suffixes that lack phylogenetic implication, while letter suffixes be reserved for structurally distinct clades of variants. For clarity and searchability, we encourage the use of descriptors that are separate from the phylogeny-based variant name to indicate developmental and other properties of variants that may be independent of structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 381 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 353 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 24%
Researcher 83 22%
Student > Master 40 10%
Student > Bachelor 32 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 25 7%
Other 65 17%
Unknown 43 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 178 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 122 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 2%
Chemistry 6 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 48 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,211,046
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#12
of 571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,111
of 166,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.