You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The architecture and effect of participation: a systematic review of community participation for communicable disease control and elimination. Implications for malaria elimination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-10-225 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo-An Atkinson, Andrew Vallely, Lisa Fitzgerald, Maxine Whittaker, Marcel Tanner |
| Abstract |
Community engagement and participation has played a critical role in successful disease control and elimination campaigns in many countries. Despite this, its benefits for malaria control and elimination are yet to be fully realized. This may be due to a limited understanding of the influences on participation in developing countries as well as inadequate investment in infrastructure and resources to support sustainable community participation. This paper reports the findings of an atypical systematic review of 60 years of literature in order to arrive at a more comprehensive awareness of the constructs of participation for communicable disease control and elimination and provide guidance for the current malaria elimination campaign. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 1% |
| Unknown | 375 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 20% |
| Researcher | 63 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 77 | 20% |
| Unknown | 93 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 60 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 64 | 16% |
| Unknown | 100 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,379,134
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,850
of 5,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,556
of 119,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#15
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.