You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
“Health divide” between indigenous and non-indigenous populations in Kerala, India: Population based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Slim Haddad, Katia Sarla Mohindra, Kendra Siekmans, Geneviève Màk, Delampady Narayana |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study is to investigate the magnitude and nature of health inequalities between indigenous (Scheduled Tribes) and non-indigenous populations, as well as between different indigenous groups, in a rural district of Kerala State, India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Unknown | 63 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 75 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2012.
All research outputs
#13,363,429
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,462
of 14,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,054
of 165,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#133
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.