You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measurement of implementation components ten years after a nationwide introduction of empirically supported programs – a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Terje Ogden, Gunnar Bjørnebekk, John Kjøbli, Joshua Patras, Terje Christiansen, Knut Taraldsen, Nina Tollefsen |
| Abstract |
Ten years after the nationwide dissemination of two evidence-based treatment programs, the status of the implementation components was evaluated in a cross-sectional study. The aim of the study was to pilot a standardized measure of implementation components by examining the factor structure, the reliabilities of the scores, and their association with implementation outcome variables. The aim was also to compare implementation profiles of the two evidence-based programs based on multi informant assessments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 73 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 25 | 32% |
| Psychology | 18 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2012.
All research outputs
#4,141,424
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#841
of 1,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,783
of 165,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#17
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.